Libraries and Learning Links of the Week

CAUL Response to the Universities Accord Discussion Paper

To be honest, I haven't paid any attention to the Australian government's “Universities Accord” process – endless talk-a-thons about “policy settings” bore me – but if you are interested in what CAUL wants the government (and, to an extent, university peak bodies) to know about academic libraries, this is worth a read.

TEQSA advice on SALAMI

TEQSA has some high level advice for academic teaching staff, and university students, about “Artificial Intelligence” [sic].

Has Tony Burke “Secured the future of Trove”?

With apologies for the self-citation, here's something I wrote over the Easter break looking at historical funding for the National Library and how it compares to the recent announcements when we take inflation into account. If you read it when it was first published and thought something was missing, you're right – the charts I created now actually display.

---

Libraries and Learning Links of the Week is published every week by Hugh Rundle.

Subscribe by following @fedi@lllotw.hugh.run on the fediverse or sign up for email below.

We missed an edition last week because ...I had a really busy week and didn't have a chance to read anything. Anyway here's some Easter reading.

JAMA’s new editor settles in, bringing open access and other changes

An interview with the new editor of the Journal of the American Medical Association.

Our big problem is not misinformation; it’s knowingness

An interesting take from Jonathan Malesic in Psyche, positing that an attitude that people already know everything and have no need for new information is often the heart of what we often think of as a problem with misinformation.

Funding announced for the National Library and Trove ahead of the Federal budget

Tony Burke made two announcements this week – the first was a “permanent” funding commitment specifically for Trove, the second two days later promised hundreds of millions of dollars for urgent capital works for Canberra-based national cultural institutions, several of which have leaking roofs.

I will have more to say regarding the National Library funding over the Easter period.

---

Libraries and Learning Links of the Week is published every week by Hugh Rundle.

Subscribe by following @fedi@lllotw.hugh.run on the fediverse or sign up for email below.

Today's Libraries and Learning Links of the Week:

Confronting White Nationalism in Libraries: A Toolkit

Just posting this tookit from the United States for no particular reason...

Google and Microsoft’s chatbots are already citing one another in a misinformation shitshow

Does what it says on the tin I guess.

What we have here is an early sign we’re stumbling into a massive game of AI misinformation telephone, in which chatbots are unable to gauge reliable news sources, misread stories about themselves, and misreport on their own capabilities. In this case, the whole thing started because of a single joke comment on Hacker News. Imagine what you could do if you wanted these systems to fail.

The Librarians are not OK

From the Chronicle of Higher Education (soft-paywalled, though it wasn't initially). This is focussed on who does and does not have “faculty status” in US universities so it's not completely transferable to Australia, however the attitudes and challenges described certainly apply here as well. Discussion about whether it might not be better to deal with the snobbery of “faculty” vs “staff” directly is left as an exercise for the reader.

---

Libraries and Learning Links of the Week is published every week by Hugh Rundle.

Subscribe by following @fedi@lllotw.hugh.run on the fediverse or sign up for email below.

Comic Book Bans & Challenges

Episode 59 of ALIA Graphic Podcast from November last year is sadly suddenly more relevant, after the Queensland Police referred a complaint about certain books to the Australian Classification Board.

In this special episode, we discuss challenges and bans to books and specifically to comics in libraries across the United States of America.

Looking from a distance, the current wave of challenges and bans the US is going through seems alien to us. We are concerned about what’s going on. We are concerned that teachers and librarians are being targeted and intimidated.

We are concerned that comics, graphic novels, and books are being pulled off the shelves. Even titles that have won awards, have received world wide recognition and have been part of the curriculum for years.

ALIA Graphic's prediction that this would come to Australia soon was, indeed, correct.

PNAS is not a good journal

Moin Syed with some truth bombs about the sorry state of academic publishing – ridiculous subscription and APC prices isn't the core problem.

Journals are simply not diagnostic of the articles published therein, and thus there is no way any particular journal could be construed as “good.”

This article also includes a hilarious Conflict of Interest Statement:

I made a bet ($5.00) with Ira Hyman in 2019 that the journal impact factor would no longer be used within five years, and thus I have financial motivation to write negatively about impact factors.

Future of Arts, Culture & Technology Symposium

Exploring the future of arts, culture, and technology in Australia – and the mindsets, capabilities and skills we need to get there.

This symposium took place on 14 and 15 February, you can see videos of some of the sessions at the link.

---

Libraries and Learning Links of the Week is published every week by Hugh Rundle.

Subscribe by following @fedi@lllotw.hugh.run on the fediverse or sign up for email below.

Let’s forget the term AI. Let’s call them Systematic Approaches to Learning Algorithms and Machine Inferences (SALAMI)

A great, short blog post from late 2019 that has resurfaced in the last week or two.

The name “artificial intelligence” has an implicit bias that does not allow for a cognitive perception adherent to reality.

From now on I will attempt to get people to refer to SALAMI instead of AI.

NormConf

NormConf was a small conference aimed at “presentations of middlebrow machine learning topics”. There's a lot here that is relevant to academia too, check it out.

We've always been distracted

From Aeon, an exploration of all the times in written history that people have worried about our relationship to texts, and what it tells us about how we should think about reading, writing, and thinking.

It is remarkable how two different eras could both say something like: ‘We live in a distracted world, almost certainly the most distracted world in human history,’ and then come to exactly opposite conclusions about what that means, and what one should do.

---

Libraries and Learning Links of the Week is published every week by Hugh Rundle.

Subscribe by following @fedi@lllotw.hugh.run on the fediverse or sign up for email below.

Beyond Web of Science and Scopus there is already an open bibliodiverse world of research – We ignore it at our peril

Saurabh Khanna, Jon Ball, Juan Pablo Alperin and John Willinsky with a rather polite article pointing out the myopia of the most common indexes of (allegedly) global research publications. North Atlantic corporates don't see much potential profit in acknowledging global south academic research, and universities and researchers in wealthy nations aren't much interested either. So everyone pretends that no research exists outside of large corporate pay-to-read or pay-to-publish journals.

AI Cataloging and Technical Services

Good news for catalogers – ChatGPT is just as bad at creating accurate MARC records as it is at producing accurate citations. Try not to look at the horrifying DALL-E images.

Openverse

You may already know about this, but I didn't. A great search engine for images and audio that are all openly licensed. You can filter by format, source and license type. Be warned though, depending on the source not all of these images are safe for work.

---

Libraries and Learning Links of the Week is published every week by Hugh Rundle.

Subscribe by following @fedi@lllotw.hugh.run on the fediverse or sign up for email below.

A bit late today – I went for a walk instead of going to work, and then accidentally took a nap instead of posting links. Sorry.

Could There Be Some Viable Challengers to Google Scholar on the Horizon?

Hilda Bastian talks through a few viable alternative options to Google Scholar, mostly building off Microsoft Academic Graph (RIP). Just as well too: the AIpocalypse may well severely dent Google's search ad business – don't be surprised to see Google Scholar shelved in the next few years as they consolidate.

The ARK origin story

I attended ARDC's little summit/workshop on PIDs this week and while I was looking at something else I stumbled upon the Archival Resource Key, something I'd never heard of before but instantly fell in love with:

ARKs are uniquely decentralized so that anyone can assign, steward, and redirect them as freely as URLs.

Shadow Libraries

From Monoskop, a collection of “shadow libraries” – illicit, unofficial, and sometimes baffling:

Independent, shadow, self-hosted, artists' digital libraries.

---

Libraries and Learning Links of the Week is published every week by Hugh Rundle.

Subscribe by following @fedi@lllotw.hugh.run on the fediverse or sign up for email below.

On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big? 🦜

In 2021 Timnit Gebru, the head of Google's “Ethical AI” research team, was abruptly fired. The reason? She refused to remove her name from this conference paper. I've read a lot of articles about chatGPT specifically and generative AI generally in the last two weeks, but this article really explains best the fundamental problems with the very large language models behind all of the tools gaining so much attention. No wonder Google didn't want to hear it:

...human-human communication is a jointly constructed activity... Even when we don't know the person who generated the language we are interpreting, we build a partial model of who they are adn what common ground we think they share with us and use this in interpreting their words.

The problem is, if one side of the communication does not have meaning, then the comprehension of the implicit meaning is an illusion arising from our singular human understanding of language...[Language Models] is a system for haphazardly stitching together sequences of linguistic forms it has observed in its vast training data, according to probabilistic information about how they combine, but without any reference to meaning: a stochastic parrot.

Lib-Static

Lib-Static is a provocation to rethink how we do digital infrastructure in libraries to recenter our technology choices around sustainable, pragmatic, and minimal approaches.

I keep thinking about this. Probably because I'm the sort of person who always prefers to fire up a text editor and write in Markdown rather than firing up a word processor or, heaven forbid, a WYSIWYG edit-in-browser setup.

ChatGPT Is a Blurry JPEG of the Web

You might have already seen this one, and apologies for all the AI/GPT links recently but, well, that's been my main focus at work the last few weeks. I really like this article because it manages to explain why the technical implementation of large language models will always make them “hallucinate”, in a way that normal people without PhDs in mathematical modelling can actually understand.

Enjoy!

---

Libraries and Learning Links of the Week is published every week by Hugh Rundle.

Subscribe by following @fedi@lllotw.hugh.run on the fediverse or sign up for email below.

I've had to read a lot of stuff about generative AI this week for work. There, I can't simply say “don't use it, it's bad”, so thank goodness I have other outlets.

We come to bury ChatGPT, not to praise it

So sayeth Dan McQuillan. I've played around with ChatGPT after resisting doing that for a couple of months, and whilst it's impressive in some ways, what's noticeable is just how unimpressive it is at most things, given the extraordinary resources poured into it. As Chloe Xiang has said, “AI isn't artificial or intelligent”.

GitHub is Sued, and We May Learn Something About Creative Commons Licensing

Microsoft GitHub's Copilot is also powered by OpenAI's GPT-3 model, and it seems pretty clear that they have absolutely committed industrial level copyright violation to build it.

Plaintiffs allege that OpenAI and GitHub assembled and distributed a commercial product called Copilot to create generative code using publicly accessible code originally made available under various “open source”-style licenses, many of which include an attribution requirement. The resulting product allegedly omitted any credit to the original creators.

Open licenses have tended to be looked upon by users as a free-for-all, without adequate attention to the very real concerns of the creators. In this case, the sheer scale of the alleged violation in terms of works used may well form the basis of the defense. “Your honor, we needed so many works that it was simply not practical to ask permission of the creators.” I don’t find this argument convincing given the ability today to license many content types at scale for TDM ...but it is an argument often offered by infringers.

What really caught my eye in this article though, to be honest, was this hilariously Scholarly Kitchenesque nugget:

The impulse to create and use open source code is reasonable and has some social utility.

Nice to know that the thing powering the entire modern economy “has some social utility”.

Curationist makes it easy to enjoy art and culture online.

Something a bit more fun to finish off. Curationist appears to be something a bit like an international non-profit Trove or DPLA. Definitely worth watching, their roadmap is pretty interesting.

See you next week!

---

Libraries and Learning Links of the Week is published every week by Hugh Rundle.

Subscribe by following @fedi@lllotw.hugh.run on the fediverse or sign up for email below.

Happy New(ish) Year! LLLotW is back. In typical style, this edition is a bit late in the day. It's been A Week.

FLASHback: Reimagining the Australian Extension to LCSH

Alissa McCulloch's opening lines provide an excellent summary of this great blog post:

Australian library catalogues speak American English. This has pissed me off for as long as I can remember (long before I started working in libraries). I want to do something about it.

A new replication study revives the question: Is taking notes by hand really better for students?

Michelle Miller with some great stuff on learning, note-taking, and research replication:

Sure, it feels like vindication for those of us who have had it with the kids-these-days tone of the worst of the laptop ban arguments. But I hope we can make this more than another tit-for-tat exchange between pro- and anti-technology camps. It should serve as a warning against the confirmation bias that is naturally going to happen as we search for evidence that supports our passionately held positions about learning. It should continue to serve as a push towards universal design for learning, with the realization that some learners are put at a disadvantage or excluded altogether when handwriting is mandatory.

Dance of the naked emperors

Adam Mastroianni has many correct opinions and interesting things to say about scholarly peer review. You should read them.

---

Libraries and Learning Links of the Week is published every week by Hugh Rundle.

Subscribe by following @fedi@lllotw.hugh.run on the fediverse or sign up for email below.